Stages of Analysis according to Carl Jung  

“Depth psychology has uncovered terrae incognitae and brought about the most dramatic confrontations. The discovery of the unconscious can be compared with the great maritime discoveries of the Renaissance and with the astronomical discoveries that followed the invention of the telescope. Each of these discoveries brought to light worlds whose existence had previously not been suspected.” Mircea Eliade, (1965)

The German word Heilsweg may be translated as “treatment,” but equally as “salvation.” The expression aptly captures the goal of a psychotherapeutic process in depth analysis. For besides providing a person with the means to contend with their symptoms and to “recover,” it also leads to the recognition that genuine healing is not a mere matter of understanding, discipline, or the most rigorous adherence to prescribed technique, but of surrender to the vital process of transformation that visits the psyche from its own abysmal depths. For there dwells the intelligence that has been tuning our bodies and minds for millions of years. It is therefore at the same time a process of the connection with the soul. Such transformation can occur only when patients open themselves to the instinctive process of healing and quite literally undergo this adventure with their whole being. As expressed in the credo attributed to Theobald de Heghelande: Ars requirit totum hominem (the art requires the whole person).

The alchemists knew that real change cannot be achieved without the work that included intervention of the spirit and that the gold only emerged out of unconditional devotion to the process. The notion of salvation moreover points, in its essence, to liberation through divine intervention, that is, to causes beyond the patient’s physical and psychic limits.

From perspective of depth psychology, the source of these forces is the unconscious, that enigmatic magnitude about which we can speak rationally only insofar as it is grasped by consciousness; beyond its sphere it becomes a metaphysical concept, yet also a mystery to which, in hope and trust in the possibility of healing, we entrust our path. A mystery that affects us, and therefore possesses reality. The analyst's advice and guidance, theoretical concepts and explanations, have only limited efficacy in the healing process; the essential leverage lies in the hands of nature. The principle that the physician treats and nature heals, vis medicatrix naturae, was already honoured by Hippocrates (460–370 BCE). However, healing comes from a dialectical process: it is the result of communication between patient and therapist, between the ego-consciousness and the unconscious, between the nature and the human being. Its successful outcome may therefore be expected only when both opposing factors are permitted realisation, the act upon each other. Nature begins to listen to us when we too listen to her. Consciousness, Jungian psychology maintains, is not merely an epiphenomenon of matter, but the goal and at the same time an indispensable component of creation. Without consciousness there would be no possibility of will, nor would the world appear at all in its phenomenal reality, for it is through consciousness that being becomes manifest and experience takes form. Yet there is an axiom implicit in this: between consciousness and the unconscious there exists a living field of communication, a space defined by the limits to which consciousness can meaningfully extend itself. There is a right measure of what may be known and assimilated, beyond which the mystery remains intact. From the acceptance of this measure — of what can be fathomed and what must be entrusted to the depths — arises a deeper fulfilment, a humility before the unknown, and with it the possibility of happiness and wholeness. From this space — nothing less and nothing more — from this very limit of reality, true wholeness emerges. Naturally, the unconscious without consciousness would remain blind, imprisoned in automatism, without the possibility of feedback, just as conscious without unconscious would remain empty. The task of ego-consciousness is therefore to find the right measure of its own agency, so that it does not fall under the dictatorship of the unconscious, yet retains the capacity to draw upon its life-giving and healing power within its own kingdom. For consciousness cannot reign beyond the parameters that constitute it, just as the eye cannot see beyond the spectrum granted to it by nature. Its sovereignty does not lie in boundless dominion, but in faithful stewardship of the realm that is properly its own in which it finds solace and salvation. The unmediated experience of the elements of the unconscious is always the experience of an untamed wilderness; therapy does not alter it, but it may provide a safe harbour.

A dialectical and responsible relationship between consciousness and the unconscious is therefore the essential condition for psychological — and indeed spiritual — development; that is to say, for the transformation of the untamed elements of the psyche into a spiritual attitude that expresses itself as inner freedom, responsible being, and lived meaning simultaneously. Such experience of the wholeness is not a state of the mind’s exaltation, but an expression of conscientious relationship to the wholly other within, which is at the same time without and not other at all. The individuation journey undertaken by the patient is akin to making art itself, through which he learns to perceive, harbor, and embody in his life this delicate bond, bringing into lived reality a capacity that until then had been only dimly intuited. 

In this paper, I would like to explore not only the stages of the psychotherapeutic journey as described by Carl Gustav Jung, but also its broader implications — the changes of consciousness patients may experience as they undertake the adventure of therapy — and to juxtaposition these with parallel perspectives offered by neo-Jungians Edward Edinger and Robert Moore. These experiences concern themselves with both – treatment and salvation. As Jung himself stressed, we cannot regard the stages of therapy dogmatically nor cling too rigidly to their sequence. The stages as I shall present them here do not capture all the nuances, possible variations, and complexities; rather, they divide a gradual unfolding into phases, similar to the phases of the moon. Psychology is an immensely heterogeneous discipline; to explain exhaustively the development of healing, or to capture all its aspects within a single conceptual framework, is practically impossible.

Although every living process is in essence a continuum, a well-grounded perspective enables us to identify culminating landmarks experienced psychologically as significant and thus to distinguish certain stages, much as we do in perceiving the seasons of the year, even though the inclination of the earth’s axis and the movements of celestial bodies are entirely continuous rather than discrete leaps during the processes. Jung’s concept allows us to recognise the completion of individual phases by the fact that the patient’s energy becomes exhausted, a new symbol arises – and the necessity of change speaks through transcendent function. Yet the analyst is at the same time one who actively participates in the change by his influence, both unconscious and conscious. For the patient, the analyst is the projective carrier of the image of the Self and its unfoldings; yet he is also an active participant who may stimulate consciousness through mirroring. The therapist may therefore, to a certain degree, initiate the next stage by saying, for example, “it is time that we explore this affect together," and so forth.

In 1929 Jung presented the theory that there are four fundamental stages of the psychotherapeutic process: confession, elucidation, education, and transformation. In German: Bekenntnis, Aufklärung, Erziehung, and Verwandlung. It should be noted that although almost a hundred years have passed since Jung first formulated his theory, in practical terms very little has changed in modern psychotherapy. The principles governing the human psyche are as old as the psyche itself. Likewise, the methods and principles of analysis introduced into practice by Jung have lost none of their significance; moreover, they have been refined and deepened by generations of neo-Jungian thinkers and clinicians, whose work has only further demonstrated their enduring efficacy.

In recent decades, we have witnessed a renewed and growing interest in depth therapy, particularly in countries where Jung was once politically suppressed or perhaps undervalued, as the time for his thought had not yet ripened. In the Czech Republic, Slovakia as well as in Poland, and other countries of Eastern Europe, thirtyeight years after the Velvet Revolution, the thirst for Jungian psychology has not abated but continues to grow stronger. A renewal of Jungian psychology is taking place across the world. Jungian institutes are emerging with new vitality, as if in response to a deeper cultural undercurrent. What now appears to be waning are the largely unquestioned ideals of a Western worldview grounded in one-sided rationalism and in the supremacy of reason understood via a narrowly defined scientific paradigm. Humanity finds itself increasingly confronted with the consequences of this complex-fed development: the manipulative dynamics of social media, the destabilising realities of global warming, the long-standing history of religious indoctrination and fundamentalism, the erosion of symbolic understanding, the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, and with it the proliferation of conspiracy thinking among others factors.

These phenomena are not emerging merely from social or technological elements; they reflect a deeper unconscious disorientation. They spring from a growing disconnection from the inner compass of the soul — from that symbolic and archetypal ground which had informed human sense of reality and meaning for millions of years. This loss is manifested in a narcissistic rift: a division between the ego, with all its inflationary tendencies to control, define, and impose its own parameters upon reality, and the Self — the nourishing, instinctive and intelligent principle within the psyche, the ground of reality itself.

This narcissistic split, this complex of our modern society, born of fear, confusion, and the anxiety of losing familiar frameworks, drives many to cling ever more rigidly to the powers of the ego. Yet these powers are, by definition, limited, insufficient and as a rule self-destructive. The more the ego attempts to secure reality on its own terms, the more it becomes estranged from the deeper ordering principle within.The more it clings to power, the more it falls prey to the forces of its own shadow. Thus, the renewed interest in Jungian psychology emerges as an intuitively sensed response; it reflects a cultural hunger for a mode of understanding capable of restoring dialogue between the divided parts of the psyche, and thereby reopening the possibility of new meaning. It offers creative ways of reconnecting the ego with the Self in a world that is historically unprecedented in its complexity — a world we are encountering for the first time in this form, and which we must consciously engage if genuine growth is to remain possible. 

Jung’s message remains alive today. He shows that empirical methods and evidence-based science can keep us humble and prevent us from straying into the easily confusing web of metaphysical speculation disguised as psychology. On the other hand, such scientific approaches are capable of providing relatively satisfactory answers to the questions of what causes things and how they are causally interconnected. However, when it comes to the question of where things are heading — for what purpose they unfold — every science necessarily reaches its limits and remains silent. Jung therefore reminds us that the door to the metaphysical must not be closed; it must remain open so that an ongoing dialogue between empirical discernment and symbolic insight can preserve a balanced apprehension of reality. What truly is comes into being only in the very moment — in the lived experience of the meeting and mutual conversion of these two worlds. That “here and now” remains the surest assurance, among all possible alternatives, that perception, decision, and action reflect the fullest measure available to us as we navigate the flow of choices that reality places before us with its grave and uncompromising urgency. The meaning of life cannot be explained by any means; it can only be brought into being through a life lived in responsibility in succession of reflective moments. 

It is not bold to say that Jung was ahead of his time — perhaps by a century. Now we are here! We find ourselves in the very moment that we can begin to use his help. It is my conviction that the present age has finally opened its doors to his thought, so that the thirst for understanding — not only of professional theory but also of the intimate, consciousness-centred processes of the psyche — may begin to be quenched. For many, such understanding may become a path of genuine development and even a form of true enlightenment in these difficult times of a veritable Babylonian confusion of cultural, spiritual, and moral values within global civilisation.

Let us now look more closely at the individual stages.

Confession

“Once the human mind had succeeded in inventing the idea of sin, man had recourse to psychic concealment; or, in analytical parlance, repression arose.” (Jung, 1929/1966, para. 124)

...